It's all
about investment, stupid!
Intentionally or not, the Obama
administration’s main offshore energy guy, Interior
Sec. Ken Salazar, is mouthing scary things
around the country these days; which, if left unchecked,
could drive U.S. industry investment into the open hands of more
friendly oil nations with plenty of large, undiscovered
reserves to be had.
I don’t mean to beat up on Salazar, the
subject of my last column, in which the secretary blamed just about all
of America’s energy ills on George W. Bush, even suggesting
the former administration conspired with the
“usual” companies to manufacture a 2010-2015
offshore leasing program tilted toward the oil industry.
Salazar further accused the former administration
of not giving
renewable energy companies a fair shake in formulating the new lease
program, while dragging its feet implementing congressional-mandated
rules and regulations associated with development of offshore
renewables, such as wind,wave, tidal and solar power.
Renewables
are no substitute for oil and gas
Hopefully, I dispelled these Salazar myths.
Don’t get me wrong. I’d love to have a windmill in
my backyard to help curb my mounting electrical bill. But, Ken, a U.S.
focus on wind and other renewables at the expense of oil and gas
exploration and development -- especially in the 85% of the U.S.
offshore that is currently off-limits to drilling -- is not going to
get this country to energy independence, at least not for the next
half-century, or longer, and with heavy doses of government subsidies.
I’d also like to remind the Obama
administration that its hydrocarbon-spewing foe (oil companies) already
have invested billions of dollars in research on renewable energy, and
continue to invest sizeable amounts of cash. So, please don’t
accuse industry of not doing its part.
My economics professor used to say, for obvious
reasons, that the last thing government should be doing during a
serious recession is to increase the financial burden on companies, as
well as individuals, through taxes and other regressive measures, such
as royalty rates on oil and gas produced from federal acreage,
including the offshore. But this is exactly what President Obama and
his Interior secretary are proposing, no doubt to help feed
Obama’s insatiable spending habit, which already has saddled
the United States with trillions in additional debt.
President
Obama's $31.5 billion headache
Obama, as outlined in his Fiscal 2010
budget, proposed raising at least $31.5 billion over 10 years
from oil and gas companies, reflecting a repeal of tax breaks for
domestic production and new charges on oil and gas production in the
Gulf of Mexico.
“It’s a concerning area, of
course, because as you put more royalty and tax burdens on the
industry, particularly a cyclical industry, you just have to be
cognizant of the potential impact it has on investments,”
explains Marvin Odum, the president of Royal Dutch Shell’s
U.S. operations.
Salazar, in a recent speech to the American
Petroleum Institute’s board of directors, reiterated
Obama’s plans, noting the administration believes industry no
longer needs any financial
incentives and that government royalties paid in the United States are
very low compared to other companies. This is nonsense. If royalties
were an offshore industry issue in other oil and gas producing
countries, how do you explain the fact that U.S. companies have been
flocking to them for years?
Shell’s Odum hits the nail on the head.
It’s all about investment, stupid! The fact is Shell and
other major oil companies -- including U.S.-- based majors ExxonMobil,
Chevron and ConocoPhillips -- operate globally. In formulating their
annual budgets, companies carefully allocate capital spending based on
the most competitive projects, whether they are in the United States or
abroad. A project with the least amount of financial burden and best
chance to make money for the company, naturally tends to get the
lion’s share of investment.
Consequently, one sure way to drive investment
dollars out of this country is to raise taxes on oil and gas production
and fiddle with royalty rates. During hard economic times, when oil
prices are one-third of last summer’s all-time high, this is
akin to pouring gasoline on a roaring fire. And it’s
certainly no path to energy independence.